SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Ker) 110

M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Abdul Sukkoor – Appellant
Versus
Muhammed Dirar – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Second appeal by 12th defendant.

2. The suit properties along with several others belonged to Uthuman Pillai, whose heirs are the plaintiffs and defendants 2 to 10. At the time of his death the suit properties were under a mortgage for Rs. 700. On Medom 24, 1119, his heirs joined to execute a sale (Ext. D4) of the suit properties to the 1st defendant to discharge his mortgage and certain other debts and also a deed of partition (Ext. Dl) of his remaining properties among themselves. Plaintiffs, who were minors then, were represented by their mother as guardian. After attaining majority, the plaintiffs instituted this suit to set aside Ext. D4 and to recover their share in the suit properties, offering to pay their share of the mortgage debt. The 1st defendant contends that the sale is valid and that the plaintiffs are estopped from impeaching the same and those contentions are adopted by his legal representative, the present appellant. The Munsiff held the suit time-barred as regards the 1st plaintiff, and decreed it as concerns the 2nd plaintiff holding Ext. D4 void as he was represented therein by his mother as guardian which she was not in law. On appeal, the Subor




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top