P.T.RAMAN NAYAR
MAHALINGA BHATTA – Appellant
Versus
VENKITARAMANA BHATT – Respondent
1. This second appeal is in a suit instituted in the Malabar area in 1948. Therefore, by reason of S.87(2) of Madras Act XIV of 1955 and S.87(2) of Kerala Act 10 of 1960, the court fee payable on the memorandum of appeal is governed by the provisions of the Court Fees Act, 1870 as in force in Madras in 1948. The suit is for partition, but the subject-matter in dispute in the appeal is capable of being valued in terms of money and has, indeed, been valued at Rs. 50,000 and odd in the memorandum of appeal. The question is whether the court-fee payable is an ad valerom fee under Art.1 of Schedule I of the Court Fees Act, 1870 as amended in Madras, or a fixed fee under Art.17-B of Schedule II.
2. The first column of Art.1 of Schedule I runs as follows: "Plaint or written statement pleading a set off or counter-claim or memorandum of appeal (not otherwise provided for in this Act) presented to any Civil or Revenue Court"
And the second column clearly shows that the article can apply only in cases where the subject-matter in dispute can be valued in money.
Article 17-B of Schedule II runs thus:
"Plaint or memorandum of appeal in every suit where it is not possible to estimate at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.