SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Ker) 144

K.K.MATHEW
K. MAHIN – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. A show cause notice dated 10-6-1964 was issued to the petitioner by the Assistant Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Cochin-3, proposing to confiscate 258 wrist watches. Ext. P-1 is the notice. The notice also stated why action should not be taken against the petitioner under S.112 of the Customs Act, 1962, for being knowingly concerned in the offence of unauthorised importation of the aforesaid

watches. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 15-6-1964. (Ext. P-2). The Collector of Customs and Central Excise, the 1st respondent, passed Ext. P-3 Proceedings by which he confiscated the watches, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,500/- on the petitioner for being knowingly concerned in the commission of the offence. The petitioner appealed to the 2nd respondent. As the appeal was not accompanied by deposit of the penalty the appeal was dismissed on that ground.

2. The case against the petitioner was that he was concerned in the importation of 258 wrist watches from Singapore to Cochin through Mr. M. K. S. Nair, who at the relevant time was the Chief Petty Officer in I. N. S. Thrisul, that the said watches were entrusted to Mr M. K S. Nair at Singapore by the petit





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top