SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 3

M.S.MENON, M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Saraswathi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Anantha Shenoi – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is an appeal by the 5th defendant from the preliminary decree in a suit for partition of a Hindu family.

2. The suit properties belonged to Lakshmana Shenoi, the late husband of the appellant, as his self-acquisitions. Defendants 1 to 4 are their sons and defendants 6 to 8 the daughters. They had another son, Anantha Shenoi, whose widow is the 4th plaintiff, and sons the plaintiffs 1 to 3. It is agreed at the Bar that the 6th defendant has, after the institution of this suit, gone out of the family by marriage, and therefore may be left out of count here.

Lakshmana Shenoi died in 1943. This suit for partition of his estate was instituted in 1947; and the preliminary decree under appeal herein was passed on January 2,1958. The judgment of the Subordinate judge reads:

"The 5th defendant is the widow of Lakshmana Shenoi. Defendants 7 and 8 are unmarried daughters... The widow and the unmarried daughters are to be maintained out of the yield of family properties... Provision has to be made for maintenance of defendants 5, 7 and 8 and for the marriage expense of defendants 7 and 8. The learned counsel for both the plaintiffs and defendants submitted that a share equal t

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top