SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 110

P.GOVINDA NAIR
P. J. Elyamma – Appellant
Versus
District Educational Officer – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The short question that falls for determination in this writ application turns on the interpretation to be placed on the note to R.8 in Chapter XXVII of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 which is in these terms :

Note: In the case of those who were in the service of any aided school prior to 4-9-1957 the age of retirement on superannuation shall be 60 years subject to the condition that the service beyond the age of 55 years shall not qualify for pension and gratuity under these rules".

2. The petitioner commenced service as a teacher as early as 1119 M.E. Though she served only for 10 months pursuant to her first appointment it was followed by an appointment for a longer period. Later too she has been working off and on with breaks, for substantial periods. It is admitted that from 5-7-1959 she had continuous service.

3. The District Educational Officer by Ext. P2 order took the view that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefits conferred by the note for continuing in service upto the 60th year apparently because she was not in service immediately before 4-9-1957 and because she had no continuous service before that date. Though representations were made by the pe


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top