SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 327

Judges : ANNA CHANDY,P.GOVINDA MENON
HAMSA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA - Respondent
Case No : Crl. A. No. 105 of 1965
Decided On : 12/08/1965
Advocates Appeared :
K. Chandrasekharan; T. Chandrasekhara Menon; C. Sankara Menon; K. Vijayan; For Appellants State Prosecutor; For Respondent

The duty of the police to question the nearest neighbours and the significance of dying declarations in assessing the credibility of witnesses.

Headnote:

Self-Defence - Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code - S.304 Part I, S.323, S.341 - S.324 - S.304 Part I, S.323, S.341, S.324

Fact of the Case:

The case involved an incident where the first accused allegedly caused the death of Hydru by stabbing him with a knife and causing hurt to another individual. The accused disputed the occurrence as described by the prosecution, claiming self-defence.

Finding of the Court:

The court rejected the evidence of the prosecution witnesses due to fundamental defects and inherent improbabilities in their story. The court found the defence version to be more credible and acquitted the accused.

Issues: The main issue revolved around the credibility of the witnesses and the self-defence claim of the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty of the police to question the nearest neighbours and discredited the prosecution witnesses due to their interested and partisan nature. The court also highlighted the significant omission in the dying declarations and the spontaneous assertion made by the accused.

Final Decision: The court acquitted the accused due to the lack of acceptable evidence and set aside the conviction and sentence against them.

Judgment :-

1. This appeal is by the two accused persons in S. C.12 of 1965 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Palghat. The first accused is convicted under S.304 Part I and 323 I. P. C. and sentenced to a concurrent term of rigorous imprisonment for ten years and three months respectively and the second under S.323 and 3411. P. C. and sentenced to a concurrent term of three months and one month.

2. It is alleged that on 14121964 at about 10.30 A. M. the first accused caused the death of Hydru by stabbing him with a knife and caused hurt to pw. 7 Abdu also by stabbing and the second accused wrongfully restrained Moideen Hajee pw.1 and caused hurt to him by beating him with a chappal.

3. The accused, the deceased Hydru and pws.1 and 7 all belong to the same village of Vallapuzha. The first accused is the younger brother of the second accused; pw. 7 is the elder brother of pw.1 and the deceased Hydru is the grandson of the uncle of pws.1 and 7. pw. 12 is the brother-in-law of Hydru and the nephew of pws.1 and 7 and the son-in-law of pw. 1.

4. pw.1 Moideen Hajee had a pair of bulls which were with his brother pw. 7 who was asked to have them sold. On the morning of 14121964 when pw.1 went to the tea shop of Kunhappu accused 2 was also there. pw.1 agreed to sell the bulls to accused 2 for Rs. 235/-in case pw. 7 did not sell them to anyone else and got Rs. 10/-as advance. A little later pw. 7 went to the tea shop of pw. 9 and met pw.1 and accused 2. pw. 7 informed pw.1 that the bulls were already sold to one Manu C. W.1 for Rs. 235/-. When pw.1 took the advance amount of Rs. 10/-to be given back to accused 2 he would not receive it. pw.1 went along the road followed by accused 2. It is alleged that when pw.1 reached the road in front of the shop of Kunhappu accused went ahead of pw.1 and restrained him from proceeding further. pw.1 pushed accused 2 when he beat pw.1 with his chappals. Seeing this pw. 7 came running from the shop of pw. 9 to the spot. At this juncture accused 1 who was in his charcoal shop ran up and beat pw. 7 with his chappals. Hydru ran up and beat the first accused on his face when accused 1 is said 10 have drawn out his knife and stabbed Hydru first on his abdomen and then near his neck below the ear. When he aimed a third stab Usufkutty pw. 12 appeared there and stabbed accused 1 with the folded knife M. 0.7 on his thigh and abdomen. The injured Hydru went to the shop of Kunhi Ahammed and lay down on the verandah and the first accused sat on the roadside. Both were removed in the same car to the Government Hospital, Perinthalmanna at about 1 P. M. pw. 3 the doctor informed the police and the Sub Magistrate of the arrival of the injured. pw. 13 the Head Constable attached to the Perinthalmanna station proceeded to the Hospital and recorded the statement of accused 1 as Ext. P-15 and later that of Hydru. (Ext. P-8). In the meanwhile the Magistrate had also recorded the dying declaration of Hydru. pw. 13 returned to the station, and registered two cases one against the first accused and the other against Hydru. The records were then transferred to Pattambi Police Station as the scene of occurrence was within the limits of that station. Hydru died at 9.15 p.m. on 15121964 and getting information of the death the Sub-Inspector pw. 15 held the inquest and sent express reports to the Circle Inspector and others concerned. pw. 16 took up the investigation and after referring the accused's case as false filed the charge-sheet in the murder case on 611965.

5. Hydru's death due to haemorrhage and shock as a result of the injuries is well proved and not disputed. He sustained one incised oblique penetrating wound on the left side of the anterior abdominal wall and another incised transverse gaping wound skin-deep on the right side of the neck below the right ear. Ext. P-2 certificate issued by pw. 3 describes the two incised gaping injuries sustained by the first accused one on the left side of the anterior abdominal wall 4"












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top