SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 245

S.VELU PILLAI, T.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY IYER
T. V. Muhamed – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The revision petitioner despatched four bundles of dry fish by the Southern Railway represented by the respondent, on the 18th December, 1960, from Vallikkunnu, a railway station in the State of Kerala, to Sagara, a railway station in the State of Mysore, under Way-bill, Ext. A-1. By mistake, the petitioner despatched the Way-bill to a wrong address in Shimoga and it was returned to him un-served. The petitioner then directed his agent at Sagara to take delivery of the goods; but in the meantime, the Station Master at Sagara, had sold the goods in public auction on the 19th January, 1961, and the petitioner's agent could not take delivery. The petitioner thereupon instituted this suit against the respondent for damages for conversion. The suit was dismissed by the Munsiff, who held that the goods have been validly sold by the Station Master, Sagara, under R.7 (e) of the 'Rules for warehousing and retention of goods' framed under S.47 (1) (f) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The contention of the petitioner in revision is, that the sale was unauthorised and invalid and therefore the respondent is liable.

2. The goods consigned being dry fish, are of course perishable











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top