1. This appeal by the 3rd defendant, now continued by his legal representatives, defendants 5 and 6, is against execution of a decree for maintenance obtained by the wife and children of the 1st defendant against him and his properties. The decree is dated 12 61113 and the first execution application filed on 6 61114 is conceded to be still pending. On 5 31958 the decree-holders filed an amended execution petition with a schedule of properties which have not been sought to be proceeded against before. The appellant contended that the application of 1958, beyond 12 years of the date of the decree, is barred by limitation and the properties sought to be proceeded against are sub-tarwad properties of the defendants which are not liable for a decree against the 1st defendant. Those objections have been over-ruled by the executing Court, and the same has been confirmed in appeal by the Subordinate Judge. Hence this second appeal.

2. Counsel for the decree-holders points out that parties were at issue in regard to the executability of the decree against certain properties that have been fraudulently transferred by the judgment-debtor to his sister and her children. By an order