SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 338

P.GOVINDA MENON
FOOD INSPECTOR, CALICUT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
HEMATHLAL CHOWDGAR – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This appeal is by the Food Inspector of the Calicut Corporation against the order of acquittal of accused 2 and 3 who along with the first accused were prosecuted in Calendar Case 221 of 1963 for sale of adulterated milk fruits, an offence punishable under S.16 (1) (a) read with S.7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (shortly stated the Act).

2. On the morning of 315 1963, pw.1 the Corporation Food Inspector visited the Ujay Ice Fruit Works, Gujarathy Street, Calicut and purchased 30 milk fruits from the first accused paying its price. They were duly sampled and sent for analysis. The report of the public analyst Ext. P-4 showed that the sample was adulterated as it contained non-permitted coaltar dye. When the accused were questioned the first accused admitted the sale but put forward the plea of warranty. Learned Magistrate negatived the plea of warranty and found the first accused guilty of the offence charged and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100. He has not filed any appeal.

3. On the ground that accused 2 and 3 constituted a company and as the prosecution had failed to prove that they were in charge of and were responsible to the company for the cond






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top