SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 326

P.GOVINDA NAIR
KARUNAKARAN NAMBIAR – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The writ applicant was appointed as a Headmaster of the Krishnavilasam Upper Primary School, Kappad, Cannanore District on 141959. The 2nd respondent to this writ application appealed from the order appointing the petitioner as a Headmaster to the Director of Public Instruction. The Director, by Ext. P-2 order, dated 30 81960 allowed the appeal of the 2nd respondent and set aside the appointment of the petitioner as Headmaster. The petitioner then moved a review application to review the order passed in appeal, Ext. P-2. This review application was allowed by Ext. P-4 order. The 2nd respondent then moved this Court in O. P. No. 529 of 1963 and T by my judgment Ext. P-5, set aside the order Ext. P-4 because Ext. P-4 order was passed without hearing the 2nd respondent and directed the Director of Public Instruction to deal with the review application afresh. I also directed that he should consider the question as to whether he has power to review his own order. The Director of Public Instruction has now passed an order Ext. P-6. Therein he has stated that he has no power of review and therefore he rejected the application for review moved by the petitioner. It is the o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top