SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 323

S.VELU PILLAI, ANNA CHANDY
Jayanthi Bai – Appellant
Versus
Popular Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. These are four appeals against the order of the learned single judge allowing C. M. P. 144 of 1958, a petition by the liquidator of the Popular Bank Ltd., under S.531 of the Companies Act, 1956. That petition was made in B. C. P. 8 of 1956 (E), upon which the Popular Bank Ltd., which may be referred to hereafter as the bank, was ordered to be wound up and in pursuance of which, the liquidation proceedings are now in progress. C. M. P. 144 of 1958 was filed for a declaration, that certain entries as to payments or adjustments in the books of the bank were made by way of fraudulent preferences in favour of some of the creditors of the bank and for ancillary reliefs. The appellants are some of the respondents in C. M. P. 144 of 1958, who as creditors, were found by the learned judge to have been preferred by the bank. Others like the appellants, who were also found by the same judgment to have been similarly preferred, have submitted to the judgment and have not appealed. The references in this judgment to respondents are as in C. M. P. 144 of 1958.

2. A. S.544 of 1961 is by respondents 9 and 10, A. S.594 of 1961 is by the 2nd respondent, A. S.595 of 1961 is by the 21st






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top