T.K.JOSEPH, T.C.RAGHAVAN
RAMASWAMY IYER – Appellant
Versus
SUPPALU AMMAL – Respondent
1. The appeal is directed against the decision of Madhavan Nair J. in second appeal confirming the decision of the Subordinate Judge reversing the decision of the Munsiff. The first matter for consideration is the interpretation of Ex. Al; and the second question is whether S.11 of the Transfer of Property Act applies to the case.
2. Ex. Al of 1074 is captioned a trust deed; and the executant thereof, Subrahmania Pattar of Kundoor Kuttala Madom, creates a trust by the same. The document recites that the executant had already constructed a temple and installed therein the idol of Guruvayurappan in 1071; and had also constructed an oottupura (feeding house) and other accessory buildings and Brahmins and Gosayees were being fed. Then follows the recital that the properties mentioned in the document with the buildings and other improvements thereon are dedicated to Guruvayurappan. The recital continues that from 1075 onwards the income of the properties after payment of Government revenue, etc., has to be utilised for meeting the expenses of the pooja, (worship) and the feeding at the oottupura, in addition to an annuity of 60 paras of paddy to Krishna Sastrigal and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.