1964 Supreme(Ker) 170
Judges : P.GOVINDA NAIR
Enoch Pharma - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala And Others - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 209, 259, 641, 643 of 1963
Decided On : 07/29/1964
Advocates Appeared :
V. K. K. Menon; C. S. Padmanabha Iyer; M. Ramachandran; C. J. Balakrishnan; For Petitioners Government Pleader; For Respondents 1 & 2 M. U. Isaac; For 3rd Respondent
The rule-making authority cannot exceed the scope and ambit of the Act by imposing duty on goods not specified in the Act.
Headnote:
ultra vires - Medicinal and Toilet Preparations - S.19 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - [38(1)]
Fact of the Case:
The writ applications questioned the validity of R.38(1) of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956, which allowed the imposition of duty and penalty on spirit supplied to manufacturers licensed to produce medicinal and toilet preparations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rule exceeded the powers of the rule-making authority as it imposed duty on goods not specified in the Act, and therefore declared R.38(1) ultra vires and directed no imposition of duty on the petitioners.
Issues: Validity of R.38(1) of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956
Ratio Decidendi: The rule exceeded the scope and ambit of the Act by imposing duty on goods not specified in the Act, which was beyond the powers of the rule-making authority.
Final Decision: R.38(1) of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 declared ultra vires and no imposition of duty on the petitioners.
1. These writ applications raise a common question about the validity of R.38 (1) of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956. This rule reads as follows:
"38 (1). The State Government may, from time to time, fix the percentage of wastage in the production of a particular medicinal or toilet preparation. Any wastage that exceeds the allowable limit and is not properly accounted for shall be charged with the duty together with such penalty not exceeding the duty leviable thereon as the Excise Commissioner may deem fit. If the alcohol in strength of a preparation is found by the Chemical Examiner to exceed the highest allowable limit by more than 3 proof degrees or to be below the lowest allowable limits its issue from the bonded manufactory, shall be withheld.".
The petitioner seeks a declaration that R.38 (1) of the above rules is ultra vires the powers of the rule-making authority. The rule-making authority is the Central Government and power has been conferred by S.19 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 to frame Rules. The Section is in these terms:
"19. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the purpose of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may
(i) provide for the assessment and collection of duties levied under this Act the authorities by whom functions under this Act are to be discharged, the issue of notices requiring payment, the manner in which the duties shall be payable and the recovery of duty not paid;
(ii) prohibit absolutely, or with such exceptions, or subject to such conditions as the Central Government may think fit, the manufacture or any process of the manufacture, of dutiable goods or of any component parts or ingredients or containers thereof, except on land or premises approved for the purpose;
(iii) regulate the removal of dutiable goods from the place where they are stored or manufactured or subjected to any process of production or manufacture and their transport to or from the premises of a licensed person, or a bonded warehouse, or to a market;
(iv) regulate the production or manufacture of any process of production or manufacture, the possession for the employment of excise officers to supervise the carrying out of any rules made under this Act;
(vi) require a manufacturer or the licensee of a warehouse to provide accommodation within the precincts of his factory or warehouse for excise officers employed to supervise the carrying out of rules made under this Act and prescribe the scale of such accommodation;
(vii) provide for the appointment, licensing management and supervision of bonded warehouses and the procedure to be followed in entering dutiable goods into and clearing goods from such warehouses or in the movement of dutiable goods from one bonded warehouse to another;
(viii) provide for the distinguishing of excisable goods which have been manufactured under licence, of materials which have been imported under licence and of goods on which duty has been paid or which are exempt from duty under this Act;
(ix) impose on persons engaged in the manufacture, storage or sale (whether on their own account or as brokers or commission agents) so far as such imposition is essential for the proper levy and collection of the duties levied under this Act, the duty of furnishing information, keeping records and making returns and prescribe the nature of such information and form of such records and returns, the particulars to be contained therein and the manner in which they shall be verified;
(x) require that dutiable goods shall not be solder offered or kept for sale except in prescribed containers, bearing a banderol, stamp or label of such nature and affixed in such manner as may be prescribed;
(xi) provide for the issue of licences and transport permits and the fees if any, to be charged thereof;
(xii) provide for the dete