SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ker) 226

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM
Krishnadas – Appellant
Versus
Ammu Poojari – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. In both these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, on behalf of the appellants, who are the same, Mr. K.V. Suryanarayana Iyer, learned counsel, attacks the orders passed by the learned Subordinate Judge of Kasaragod, dismissing two applications filed by his clients, for recording a compromise in two appeals namely A.S. Nos. 28 of 1962 and 31 of 1962 on the file of that court.

2. Though, for the purpose of disposing of these appeals, it may not be really necessary to go very much into the nature of the litigations, that has led to the filing of these two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, nevertheless it is necessary to refer to two suits instituted by the parties concerned, in order to appreciate the circumstances under which the appeals in the lower court came to be filed by the present appellants.

3. It is seen that the present appellants had instituted a suit O.S. No. 127 of 1957, on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Kasaragod, for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants therein from trespassing on their property or otherwise interfering with the peaceful possession of the same by them. It is also seen that there was another suit, viz., O.S. No. 163 of 1958,

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top