ANNA CHANDY, P.GOVINDA MENON
Kunhayu – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
1. The five respondents were convicted by the Sub-Magistrate, Perinthalmanna, for offences under S.147 and 379 I.P.C. and fined Rs. 25/- each under the first count and Rs. 75/- under the second. Their appeal to the District Magistrate, Palghat was unsuccessful.
2. The case against them was that they committed theft of standing paddy crop which had been attached in pursuance of a decree of the Munsiff's Court Perinthalmanna. Pw. 3 Gopala Pillai is the decree-holder. On his application an order of attachment was issued by the said Munsiff's Court attaching the standing paddy crop on seven items of property. Pw. 2 the Amin of the court effected the attachment and entrusted the crop to Pw.1 on Kychit. Accused 1 and 2 who are the judgment-debtors, applied for and obtained the release of the crops in four items of property on deposit of Rs. 250/- in court. The prosecution case is that on the day succeeding the order of release the accused harvested the crops from all the items of property including those in regard to which the attachment was still in force. The stolen paddy and straw were later recovered from the house of accused 2. Pw.1 reported the matter to the Munsiff and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.