SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ker) 115

M.S.MENON, M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Deputy CAIT and Sales Tax, Quilon – Appellant
Versus
Travancore Rubber and Tea Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This petition by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, South Zone, Quilon, is directed against the decision of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Trivandrum, in Tribunal Appeal No. 428 of 1962. That decision is to the effect that the respondent, the Travancore Rubber and Tea Company Limited, Alleppey, is not a dealer as defined in S.2(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, in respect of its sales of rubber and that those sales are not as a result liable to taxation under the said enactment.

The definition of the expression "dealer" as given in S.2(b) of the Act reads as follows:

"'dealer' means any person who carries on the business of buying or selling goods and includes a Government which carries on such business."

It is common ground that all that the company does is to convert the latex tapped from its rubber trees into sheets and effect a sale of those sheets to its customers. The sole question for determination is whether in these circumstances the company can be considered to be a person who carries on the business of selling goods.

3. Latex is an opaque liquid resembling milk. It is not disputed that the usual method of selling it is after converting it into sheet















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top