SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ker) 112

M.S.MENON, M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Elixir Plantations Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The question referred is "whether the amount of Rs. 68,000/- was correctly brought to tax?" The statement of the case in its Para.2 reads:

"The assessee purchased a Coffee Estate known as 'Greenfield' Estate in Coorg in 1958. During the accounting year 1959-60, relevant to the assessment year 1960-61, the assessee sold certain dead and windfallen Avenue Trees for a sum of Rs. 68,690 and credited it in the profit and loss account under miscellaneous receipts in Greenfield Estate. Of this, Rs. 68,000 was the amount received from a firm called Malankara Timbers, a registered partnership".

It is clear from the above statement that the sum of Rs. 68,000 which is the subject matter of reference, is part of the sale-proceeds of dead and windfallen avenue trees cut and removed from the Estate, which was purchased a year or two before the transaction. If the trees are dead and windfallen it is certain that no future growth out of them is possible. The principle of 41 ITR. 313 is that if the trees are so cut as to leave their stumps capable of yielding further growth, the proceeds of the cutting will be revenue, and not capital. When the sale is of "dead and windfallen" trees,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top