SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ker) 306

T.C.RAGHAVAN
Jameela Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Antony Netto – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The first petition is for impleading the petitioner, an assignee from the deceased sole appellant, as an additional appellant in the appeal; and the other petition is for setting aside the abatement of the appeal.

2. The appellant assigned her rights to the petitioner, when the suit against the former was pending in the lower court. The suit went against the appellant; and she filed the appeal before this Court. Thereafter, she died on 13th March 1964, and the petition for bringing on record the assignee as an additional appellant was filed ninety days thereafter, i. e., after the appeal abated. The petition for setting aside the abatement was also filed.

3. The respondent's counsel brings to my notice the decision of the Supreme Court in Sm. Saila Bala Dassi v. Sm. Nirmala Sundari Dassi (A.I.R.1958 S.C. 394). Therein the Supreme Court has approved the legal position that an application made by an assignee, who takes the assignment during the pendency of the suit, to bring him on record at the appellate stage cannot be allowed under 0.22 R.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Supreme Court appears to have also approved that the expression 'during the pendency of a su



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top