SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ker) 98

T.K.JOSEPH
KOCHOUSEPH – Appellant
Versus
KUNJU VAREED – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This Civil Revision Petition by the plaintiff in Small Cause Suit No. 622 of 1960 of the Munsiff's Court of Irinjalakuda is directed against the decree in the suit and the order for compensatory costs passed against the plaintiff.

2. The suit was for recovery of a sum of Rs. 3.30 as jenmikaram and 5 nP as interest thereon. The defendant raised several contentions such as that the suit was premature, that the capacity of the para mentioned in the kanom deed was smaller than the standard para, that the price of paddy claimed was excessive, that the defendant had sent a sum of Rs. 3.46 by money order towards the plaint claim which the plaintiff refused to accept, that the court had no jurisdiction to try the suit and that the defendant should get his costs as the plaintiff had refused to accept the amount tendered and as the suit was filed to harass him. It was also stated in the written statement that the capacity of the para was a matter which had to be decided on evidence. The court below held that the "Ettuthappupara" which was the measure mentioned in the kanom deed was 22/23 of the Standard Para in capacity and that paddy was to be valued at Rs. 1.75 per standard p










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top