Judges : M.S.MENON,M.MADHAVAN NAIR
REV.FR.ANTONY - Appellant
Versus
HEALTH INSPECTOR AND OTHERS - Respondent
Case No : O. P. No. 1894 of 1963
Decided On : 11/18/1963
Advocates Appeared :
V. K. K. Menon; E. P. Varghese; For Petitioner Government Pleader; For Respondents 1 & 2 T. C. N. Menon; K. R. Panicker; For Respondents 3 to 7
Public Health Act - Validity of Order - S.42 of Travancore-Cochin Public Health Act, 1955 - The court discussed the validity of an order issued under S.42 of the Travancore-Cochin Public Health Act, 1955. The court emphasized the requirement of the Health Officer's independent 'satisfaction' as a condition precedent to any order under that section. The court held that the order could not be sustained as the 'satisfaction' was not independent but inspired, and therefore quashed the order.
Fact of the Case:
The petition questions the validity of an order issued under the Travancore Public Health Act, 1121, and prays for a writ of certiorari quashing the said order under Art.226 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the order issued under S.42 of the Travancore-Cochin Public Health Act, 1955, was not based on the independent 'satisfaction' of the Health Officer, as required by the section. Therefore, the court quashed the order.
Issues: Validity of the order issued under S.42 of the Travancore-Cochin Public Health Act, 1955, and the requirement of the Health Officer's independent 'satisfaction' as a condition precedent to any order under that section.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the requirement of the Health Officer's independent 'satisfaction' as a condition precedent to any order under S.42 of the Travancore-Cochin Public Health Act, 1955. The court held that the order could not be sustained as the 'satisfaction' was not independent but inspired.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order and allowed the petition with freedom reserved to the Health Officer to take such further action as he deems fit subject to his own satisfaction and in accordance with the law.
1. This is a petition by the Vicar of the St. Francis Assisi Church, Thykal, in the Sherthallay Taluk. The petition questions the validity of Ext. P-1, an order of the 1st respondent dated 30-5-1963, and prays for a writ of certiorari quashing the said order under Art.226 of the Constitution. .
2. The 1st respondent is the Health Officer of the Sherthallay Taluk. The 2nd respondent is the State of Kerala represented by the Chief Secretary to Government, Trivandrum. Respondents 3 to 7 were brought on record in pursuance of the order in C. M. P. No. 7015 of 1963. They are persons interested in supporting the order.
3. The statute under which Ext. P-1 was issued is stated therein as the Travancore Public Health Act, 1121. Ext. P-1 is in a printed form and space is available therein for inserting the relevant section of the Act. That space was left unfilled. It is common ground that the Travancore Public Health Act, 1121, was not in force when Ext. P-1 was issued.
4. On 20-6-1963 the Health Officer-the successor to the officer who issued Ext. P-1-addressed the District Medical Officer of Health, Alleppey, as follows:
"I am enclosing herewith a copy of each of the prohibitory notice dated 30 51963 and the letter dated 17-6-1965 from Rev. Fr. Dennis Arasarkavil received under registered cover.
In the above letter it has been stated that the prohibitory notice dated 30 51963 served on the petitioner was issued under Act HI of 1121 and is not in order as the said Act is already repealed vide S.162 of Travancore-Cochin Public Health Act XVI of 1955. But in the office copy of the said notice copy enclosed) the year 1121 printed has been corrected to read as 1955. It is not known whether the original has been corrected or not. From the above letter it is evident that it was issued under the repealed Act. As such I think that the said notice served has to be cancelled and a fresh notice has to be issued under the Act now in force XVI of 1955. I would like to know whether it would be legal if I issue a fresh notice cancelling the one already issued by my predecessor. Request early orders in the matter." (Ext. P-2)
The reply of the District Medical Officer of Health is contained in a memo dated 25 61963. That memo reads as follows:
"The Health Inspector, Sherthallay will notify the Parish Priest, St. Francis Assisi Church, Thykal. that the prohibitory notice served on him was on the strength of the Public Health Act of 1955 and not on the Act of 1121 and that if the notice on the printed form already served on him had not been suitably modified by substituting '1955' instead of the printed matter'1121', the same may be treated as modified and read as '1955' instead of 1121'. " (Ext. P-3).
5. In compliance with the memo the Health Officer wrote to Rev. Fr. Dennis Arasarkadavil on 26- 61963. That letter was in the following terms:
"You are hereby requested to note that the prohibitory notice served on you on 30 51963 from this office was on the strength of the Public Health Act of 1955 and not on the Act of 1121 and that if the notice on the printed form already served on you had not been suitably modified by substituting '1955' instead of the printed matter '1121' the same may be treated as modified and read as '1955' instead of '1121'. " (Ext. P-4)
6. Ext. P 1 reads as follows:
6 A. The Deputy Director of Health Services seems to have conducted " the local inspection in accordance with the oral directions of the Director of Health Services. This fact is mentioned in the Deputy Director's report to the Director dated 20 51963. That report [Ext. P-5] concludes with the statement that he was of the opinion that the location of the cemetery at the site concerned was objectionable "from the public Health point of view".
7. On 25 51963 the Director of Health Services issued a Memo to the Assistant District Medical Officer of Health which reads as follows:
"A copy of inspection report of Deputy Director of Health Services regarding location of a ce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.