SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ker) 280

ANNA CHANDY
KRISHNA PILLAI RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The revision petitioners (accused 1 and 4) with three others were tried before the Sub Magistrate, Pathanamthitta for offences under the Kerala Gaming Act (Act 20 of 1960). They were all convicted under

S.7 of the Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50/-or in default to undergo one week's simple imprisonment. One of them, accused 2, in whose house the gaming took place was also convicted under

S.8 of the Act and given another fine of Rs. 50/- or in default one week's imprisonment. Their appeal to the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Adoor was unsuccessful and hence this revision.

2. The prosecution case is that at about 5-30 P. M. on 13-10-1962 the Sub Inspector of Pathanamthitta (Pw. 1] on receiving information that the accused were playing cards for game on the verandah of accused 2's house raided the place with a police party. On seeing the police accused 4 and 5 ran away from the place. The others who stayed behind were arrested on the spot and playing cards and currency notes totalling Rs. 27/-were recovered. All the accused denied the charge.

3. Of the four witnesses cited by the prosecution pw.1 the Sub-Inspector of Police who raided the house and pw. 2 an attestor t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top