SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ker) 317

T.K.JOSEPH, T.C.RAGHAVAN
Govindan – Appellant
Versus
Bharathi – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The 1st defendant in a suit for partition of the assets of a person named Dr. Krishnan, who died in England on 18th October 1950, is the appellant; and the dispute is confined to the assets included in Sch. C to the plaint. These assets constitute the sale proceeds of the properties left by Dr. Krishnan in England, both immovable and movable, consisting of a house and other movables. The assets amount to Rs 1,18,075 and that amount is now in deposit within the jurisdiction of the lower court.

2. Three Ezhava brothers, Sankaran Padmanabhan, Sankaran Krishnan (deceased Dr. Krishnan) and Dr. Sankaran Govindan (1st defendant), and a sister, the 2nd defendant, were the children of late Sankaran

belonging to the erstwhile Travancore State. Dr. Krishnan left fox England in 1920 for higher studies in medicine. For some time he received remittances from home; but after his father's death his elder brother, Padmanabhan, did not send regular remittances and therefore Dr. Krishnan was stranded in England. He met an elderly lady, Miss Hepworth; and she helped him to prosecute his studies. He qualified himself in medicine and started practice at Sheffield and was able to build up a








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top