1962 Supreme(Ker) 110

Judges : M.S.MENON,T.K.JOSEPH
Mammad - Appellant
Versus
Muhammad - Respondent
Case No : No.
Decided On : 05/28/1962
Advocates Appeared :
V. P. Gopalan Nambiar; V. Bhaskaran Nambiar; C. R. Natarajan; For Petitioners

The existing practice of typing, rather than printing, copies of judgments and orders in Civil Revision Petitions should continue, as the rules were not clear enough to warrant a departure from this practice.

Headnote:

Judgments - Civil Revision Petitions - Printing of copies not required

Fact of the Case:

The court held that copies of judgments and orders filed in Civil Revision Petitions need not be printed but need only be typed.

Finding of the Court:

The rules concerned are not clear enough to warrant departure from the practice which has been in existence from the inception of this Court.

Issues: Clarity of rules regarding printing of copies in Civil Revision Petitions

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the existing practice of typing, rather than printing, copies of judgments and orders in Civil Revision Petitions should continue, as the rules were not clear enough to warrant a departure from this practice.

Final Decision: The court decided that printing of copies in Civil Revision Petitions is not required, and any modification to this practice should be addressed through future amendment of the rules.