M.S.MENON, T.K.JOSEPH
Dharmodayam Company – Appellant
Versus
Balakrishnan – Respondent
1. These appeals arise from the decision of the Subordinate Judge of Kozhikode in O.S. No. 17 of 1956. The plaintiffs are the appellants in A.S. No. 551 of 1958. The 2nd defendant is the appellant in A.S. No. 558 of 1958.
2. The suit was in pursuance of : two chitty hypothecation bonds executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the Dharmodayam Company, Trichur, of which the plaintiffs were the trustees. The 2nd defendant, the son of the 1st defendant, contended that the family properties cannot be made liable for the debt under the law obtaining in the Thiyya community of Calicut to which the 1st and 2nd defendants belonged.
3. The contentions of the 2nd defendant were that according to the customary law applicable to the community the family properties were not partible and there was no rule of pious obligation to discharge the debts of father. The learned Subordinate Judge rejected the first contention, accepted the second, and directed as follows:
"In the result the plaintiffs are given the usual mortgage decree for sale, for the plaint amount with interest and costs of the suit against the 1st defendant's half share in the plaint schedule properties. The personal remed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.