SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Ker) 247

P.GOVINDA MENON
Abdurahiman Musaliar – Appellant
Versus
Ayissu – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is a revision petition from the order of the Munsiff-Magistrate of Quilandy ordering the revision petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs. 15 per mensem to his wife from the date of the petition till 11-11-60, the date of expiry of the period of Iddat and Rs. 10/- per mensem to his child from the date of the petition.

2. It is contended that the fact that he had divorced his wife prior to the filing of the petition deprived the Magistrate of jurisdiction under S.488 Cr. P.C., to order maintenance to the wife. A reference to S.488 would show that if on the date on which the application is made the relationship of husband and wife exists the Magistrate will have jurisdiction to pass an order. The proper date to be considered is the date on which the application is made. If the fact of divorce comes to the knowledge of the wife only after the filing of the petition, she may be entitled to file a petition.

3. Here in this case the wife has clearly admitted that she knew about the divorce before the date of the petition. Therefore the application was not competent at the time it was made as she was no longer the wife of the applicant. She may be entitled to claim maintenan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top