SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ker) 178

P.GOVINDA MENON
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
THIRAVIYAM PANICKER – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Criminal Appeal 346/59 and Criminal Revision Petition 321/59 arise out of an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Trivandrum in C. C. 22/59. Criminal Appeal 346/59 is filed by the State against the order of acquittal of the four respondents who had been charged along with another for an offence punishable under S.420 I. P. C. Criminal Revision Petition 321/59 is a petition filed earlier by the 1st informant pw.1 in the case for revising the order of the learned Magistrate challenging the order of acquittal of the accused and also the order regarding the disposal of the properties. Those two matters were hoard together and I propose to pass one common order.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Puthenchantha had charged the four respondents who were accused Nos.1 to 3 and 5 for having cheated pw. 1, an offence punishable under S.420 I. P. C. pw.1 is a big businessman belonging to Kanyakumari District. It is stated that he had made arrangements with a firm "Kulathunkal Corporation" to take delivery of a motor-chasis. For that purpose on 18-11-1958 he came to Trivandrum by the morning bus with a sum of Rs. 5000/- all in hundred rupee notes. Accused 1 and 2 who wer






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top