SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ker) 163

Judges : T.C.RAGHAVAN
Kunjan - Appellant
Versus
Kalliani Amma - Respondent
Case No : C. R. P. No. 495 of 1960
Decided On : 07/21/1960
Advocates Appeared :
N. D. P. Nambooripad; For Petitioner K. K. Mathew; George Vadakkel; M. A. Joseph; For Respondents

Defendant's right to appear and participate in the proceedings under O.8, R.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Headnote:

O.9, R.7, C.P.C - Dismissal of petition and defendant's right to appear - The court held that the lower court was not correct in dismissing the petition altogether and that the defendant should have been allowed to participate in the proceedings under O.8, R.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Fact of the Case:

The lower court dismissed the petition without allowing the defendant to participate in the proceedings, based on the defendant's failure to assign good cause for previous non-appearance.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the lower court's dismissal of the petition was not correct and directed the lower court to rehear the petition in the light of the judgment.

Issues: The issue was whether the defendant should have been allowed to participate in the proceedings despite previous non-appearance and whether the lower court's dismissal of the petition was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted O.9, R.7, C.P.C and held that the defendant should have been allowed to appear at the adjourned hearing and participate in the proceedings under O.8, R.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Final Decision: The court set aside the lower court's order and directed it to rehear the petition, with the petitioner being directed to pay the costs of the revision.

Judgment :-

1. The lower court is not right in dismissing the petition altogether. Of course the finding of the lower court that the petitioner has failed to assign good cause for his previous non-appearance is unassailable; but that is not sufficient to dismiss the petition filed under O.9, R.7, C.P.C. R.7 provides that if at an adjourned hearing the defendant appears and shows good cause for his previous non-appearance, he may be heard in answer to the suit as if he had appeared on the day fixed for his appearance. This does not mean that he cannot be allowed to appear at all if he does not show good cause. It only means that he cannot be relegated to the position he would have occupied if he had appeared. If he appears on the day to which the hearing of the suit is adjourned, he cannot be prevented from participating in the proceedings at all simply because he did not appear on a previous hearing. This has been decided in Sangaram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Kotah and another (AIR. 1955 S.C. 425). Therefore it is clear that the dismissal of the petition by the lower court is not correct.

2. What the lower court should have done was to have allowed the defendant to participate in the proceedings and should have considered the case under 0.8, R.10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. If the court considered that the case was one in which a written statement should have, been put in, then the consequences entailed by R.10 should be suffered. And what those consequences were should have been decided by the court in the judicial exercise of its discretion, to meet the ends of justice, which means, in the words of the Supreme Court "justice not only to the defendant and the other side but also to witnesses and others who may be inconvenienced."

Therefore, I set aside the order of the lower court and direct it to rehear the petition in the light of my above judgment. In the circumstances, the petitioner will pay the costs of this revision.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top