MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI, M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Raghava Menon – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Police, Kerala – Respondent
1. The appellant's writ petition under Art.226 has been rejected by a learned judge of this Court. He had entered the police service in 1941, and was serving till 1953. In that year a complaint about the appellant's having contravened the Police Standing Order No. 134, due to misbehaviour under the influence of drink, was investigated by the Circle Inspector; and the Superintendent of Police, on the report furnished by the investigating officer, dismissed the appellant. The order was made on January 15, 1954, and the appellant submitted against the order several representations to the higher authorities. On May 18, 1958, the Inspector General of Police cancelled the dismissal order placing the appellant under suspension with effect from the date of the removal from service. The Inspector General of Police has, in the same order, come to the conclusion about the earlier order being without jurisdiction, and had proposed the appellant being dismissed from the date of his removal from service. The Inspector General his, therefore, directed the appellant to show cause, within 15 days of the receipt of the order, why the proposed punishment should not be inflicted. For purpo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.