SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Ker) 14

KUMARA PILLAI, T.K.JOSEPH
Lonappan – Appellant
Versus
Sub Inspector, Palghat – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is an appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Madras dismissing an application under Art.226 of the Constitution of India. The appellant is the owner of R. S. No. 125/7 in Thaikad Amsam, Ponnani Taluk. His house is situated in the adjacent land, R. S. No. 125/12. Both these survey numbers, R. S.125/7 and 125/12, are enclosed by one fence all round and form part of the compound in which the appellant's house is situated. But a portion of R. S.125/7 has been leased by the appellant to one Appu for the purpose of conducting a school, known as the Thaikad South Higher Elementary School. There is a dispute between Appu and the appellant as to who put up the school building in R. S. No. 125/7 and to whom that building belongs According to the appellant, the building was put up by him and belongs to him and Appu has been allowed only the use of it. According to Appu the building has been put up by him and belongs to him. This dispute has led to a civil suit between them, and we were told at the time of the hearing of this appeal that the said suit is now pending in second appeal in the High Court. While that suit was pending in the trial




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top