SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Ker) 45

KUMARA PILLAI, ANNA CHANDY
Kesavan Embranthiri – Appellant
Versus
Krishnan Embranthiri – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner is the 1st defendant in 0. S.309/54 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Hosdrug. The suit was filed by his brother for partition of joint family properties. The plaintiff alleged that the community of Embrandiries to which the parties belonged was governed by Hindu Mithakshara Law and that he was entitled to an equal share along with his brothers defendants 1 and 2. The 1st defendant on the other hand contended that the parties were Malayalee Brahmins constituting an Illom governed by the Madras Namboodiri Art.21 of 1933, and the properties if partible at all, could be partitioned only under the provisions of that Act, in which case the plaintiff is not entitled to 1/3rd share, and his wife and children should necessarily be impleaded. On this contention an issue was raised "whether the plaintiff and defendants were governed by Mithakshara Law or the Namboodiri Act of 1933."

2. The learned Munsiff found that the parties were governed by Hindu Mithakshara Law and granted a preliminary decree for partition of the plaintiff's 1/3rd share. The 1st defendant went up in appeal and the Subordinate Judge of Kasargode reversed the finding of the trial court and









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top