M.S.MENON, RAMAN NAYAR
Rosamma Punnose – Appellant
Versus
Balakrishnan Nair – Respondent
1. At the last General Election held in March 1957, the appellant was declared duly elected to the Legislative Assembly of this State from the General Seat of the Devicolam Constituency. In April the 1st respondent, a candidate whose nomination had been rejected by the Returning Officer, filed the present petition for a declaration that the election of the appellant was void on the ground mentioned in S.100(1)(c) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The petition has been allowed by the Election Tribunal, Kottayam, and hence this appeal.
2. The 2nd respondent was returned from the reserved seat, and against him no relief has been claimed. He may be ignored altogether and we shall here after refer to the 1st respondent (namely, the petitioner before the Tribunal) as merely the respondent.
3. The only question is whether the rejection of the respondent's nomination was improper. If it was, it is not disputed that in view of S.100 (1) (c) of the Act the election of the appellant has to be set aside. The competence of the respondent to maintain the petition was never in question,
4. The last date appointed for making nominations w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.