SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ker) 146

SANKARAN, VARADARAJA IYENGAR
State – Appellant
Versus
Madhogaria – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This appeal is by the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, against the judgment of acquittal dated 30-9-1957 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Alleppey in a complaint before him under the Factories Act, 68 of 1948.

2. The accused is B. Madhogaria, Manager of the Firm of Tharachand Sivkumar at Alleppey. On 11-9-1956, at 1 P. M. the Inspector of Factories, Alleppey, visited the premises of the firm and there found 33 workers engaged in cutting and drying arecanuts and garbling pepper. This, according to the Inspector constituted the conduct of a manufacturing process by 20 and more persons and so amounted to the running of a factory. And, as the accused had not registered his premises as a factory or obtained the requisite licence or permission and had not also given the due notices, he was liable to be prosecuted for various offences under the Factories Act and the Rules thereunder. So he obtained permission dated 6-12-1956 from the Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers and filed the complaint herein on 10-12-1956. The

accused pleaded not guilty.

3. The Inspector of Factories as P. W.1 testified to the facts and also proved the mahazar Ext. P. I which he










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top