SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ker) 167

Judges : KOSHI,M.S.MENON
Thresia - Appellant
Versus
Ayuppunni - Respondent
Case No : S. A. No. 131 of 1956 (E)
Decided On : 08/25/1958
Advocates Appeared :
V. Sankara Menon; For Appellants T. S. Venkiteswara Iyer; For Respondents 1 to 4

The temporary nature of Buildings Lease and Rent Control Measures does not oust the Civil Court's jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Buildings Lease and Rent Control Measures - The Civil Court's jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction is not ousted by the temporary nature of these measures, though actual eviction can take place only as per a Rent Controller's order.

Fact of the Case:

The only point pressed in the second appeal is that in view of the Buildings Lease and Rent Control Measures the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction.

Finding of the Court:

The view that has gained recognition is that the Civil Court's jurisdiction to pass a decree is not ousted by the temporary nature of the measures, and the point raised cannot succeed.

Issues: The only point pressed in the second appeal is the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to pass a decree for eviction in view of the Buildings Lease and Rent Control Measures.

Ratio Decidendi: The Civil Court's jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction is not ousted by the temporary nature of the Buildings Lease and Rent Control Measures.

Final Decision: As no other point arises in the case, the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Judgment :-

1. The only point pressed in the second appeal is that in view of the Buildings Lease and Rent Control Measures the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction. The question has been the subject of controversy in various cases and the view that has gained recognition is that these measures being of a temporary nature the Civil Court's jurisdiction to pass a decree is not ousted though actual eviction can take place only as per a Rent Controller's order vide 1955 K. L. T. 924. The point raised cannot therefore succeed. As no other point arises in the case we dismiss the appeal with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top