Judges : KOSHI,VAIDIALINGAM
Ramakrishna Panicker - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : Crl. A. No. 102 of 1958
Decided On : 12/17/1958
Advocates Appeared :
Mathew Muricken; Thomas P. Mathekkal; V. S. Muthathu; P. Karunakaran Nair; C. K. Sivasankara Panicker; George K Nair; M. M. Cherian; For Accused Public Prosecutor; For State
Criminal Appeal - Police Brutality - S.304(2), S.323, I.P.C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the application of S.304(2) and S.323 of the Indian Penal Code. The judgment highlighted the interpretation of the legal provisions and their influence on the court's decision, ultimately leading to the alteration of the conviction from S.304(2) to S.323 for accused 1.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved two police head-constables accused of assaulting a drunk and disorderly individual in police custody, resulting in the individual's death. The accused persons appealed against their convictions and sentences.
Finding of the Court:
The court found accused 1 guilty of causing hurt under S.323, but altered the conviction from S.304(2) to S.323 due to lack of intention to cause death or grievous hurt. Accused 2's conviction for causing hurt under S.323 was confirmed.
Issues: The issues included the misjoinder of charges and persons, the nature of the injuries inflicted, and the intention of the accused in causing the injuries.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of legal provisions, medical evidence, and precedents related to causing hurt to a diseased organ and the intention to cause grievous hurt or death.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence of accused 1 were altered from S.304(2) to S.323, with a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 1 year. Accused 2's conviction and sentence of 6 months' rigorous imprisonment were confirmed.
1. This Criminal Appeal arises out of the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Kottayam in Sessions Case No. 87 of 1957 on the file of the Kottayam Sessions Court. There were two accused persons in the case. Accused 1 stands convicted under S.304(2) and under S.323, I.P.C. He has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 4 years for the first mentioned offence and like imprisonment for 6 months for the other. The two sentences are however to run concurrently. Accused 2, who stood charged with abetment of the offence under S.304(2) alleged to have been committed by accused 1 has been acquitted of that charge, but he has been convicted on a further charge under S.323, I.P.C. for which also he was tried. For that offence he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months. Accused 1 and accused 2 have preferred this joint appeal against their convictions and sentences.
2. On the date of the occurrence forming the subject of the case, that is, 29-1-1957, accused 1 and accused 2 were both head-constables of police attached to the Kottayam East Police Station. At about 3 p. m. on that date accused 1 found one Antony Devassia alias Pappayi drunk and behaving in a disorderly and riotous manner on the public road in front of the cycle shop of Pw. 13 on the Kottayam-Kumali road, not far away from the District Court buildings at Kottayam. Devassia had taken a cycle from the shop of Pw. 13 on hire while the latter was absent from his shop and brought it back with its break damaged. Over that an altercation took place between Pw. 13 and Devassia and it was at that time accused 1 arrived there. Finding that Devassia was fully drunk and unable to take care of himself, accused 1 took him into custody and directed a police constable (Pw. 3) who was then there to take him to the East Police Station. Pw. 3 acted accordingly and produced Devassia before the station with his report Ext. P2. That was at 3-40 p. m. The Sub-Inspector of Police (Pw. 17) received the report and made an entry in the general diary about it at 4 p. m., vide Ext. P-4, the general diary entry. Pw. 4, a police constable to whom the Sub-Inspector then handed over the station charge and Pw. 2, the constable on sentry duty, were asked to keep Devassia under surveillance until after he recovered from the effects of the drink or until the Sub-Inspector returned to the station. The Sub-Inspector returned to the station only at 6-30 p. m. vide Ext. P17 the general diary entry. According to the prosecution soon after the Sub-Inspector left the station, accused 1 and accused 2 went there and they both belaboured Devassia. It would appear that accused 1 first gave two blows on Devassia's cheeks and then bending his head down gave him five or six hits with his elbows on Devassia's back. Afterwards it is alleged that accused 1 raised Devassia's head by pulling his heir and fisted him twice in the region of his abdomen. While accused 1 was inflicting injuries on Devassia accused 2 was standing by the side of accused 1. Immediately afterwards he (accused 2) caught hold of Devassia and putting his head between his legs gave a few hits with the elbows on Devassia's back. Devassia got rather exhausted by the belabouring and at the instance of accused 1, two constables, Pw.1 and Pw. 5 took him out into the courtyard so that fresh air might improve his condition. He was also given some water to drink and later when his son, Pw. 11 came there, at the instance of Pw. 3 some soda-water was brought for him to drink. All these ministrations did him no good and accused 1 tried to make him get up by beating him with a stick (police lathi) on his feet. Accused 1 and accused 2 then told others that Devassia was merely pretending that he felt very bad. Later he was taken from the courtyard into one of the rooms of the station. At about 6-30 p. m. the Sub-Inspector returned to the station and he found that Devassia's condition was rather prec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.