1. These are two revision petitions calling in question two different orders passed by the District Judge of Parur but to the same effect of authorising the sale of the properties appertaining to the Jewish Synagogue at Parur. As they involved difficult questions of law and practice they were referred to a Division Bench by one of us before whom it came on in the first instance.

2. The matter arises in execution of a decree in O.S. 37 of 1116 of the Parur District Court. This suit was filed by some members of the Jewish Synagogue at Parur for removal of the trustees of the Synagogue for alleged misconduct and for rendition of accounts. The suit was decreed by the trial court and appeal was taken as A.S. 207 and 230 of 1951 before the High Court by some of the defendants. The appeals were however disposed of not on the merits but on basis of a compromise between the parties in recognition of the state of things touching the entire community which had newly arisen viz., the ardent and more or less unanimous wish of the members to migrate to Palestine and become citizens of Israel. It would appear that all the adult members of the community at Parur had assembled together o