SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Ker) 248

Judges : KOSHI,KUMARA PILLAI,M.S.MENON
Thankamma - Appellant
Versus
Narayana Pillai - Respondent
Case No : A. S. No. 434 of 1953 (E)
Decided On : 09/18/1957
Advocates Appeared :
T. N. Subramonia Iyer; S. Subramonia Iyer; For Appellant T. S. Krishnamurthy Iyer; For Respondents

The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific allegations and proof of the custom relied upon, and the need for evidence to establish the existence of any customary law.

Headnote:

Customary Law - Thenkasi Vellala woman - Hindu Mitakshara Law - [No specific act sections referenced]

Fact of the Case:

The suit was brought by a Thenkasi Vellala woman for partition and recovery of one-fifth share in her deceased father's assets under the customary law governing her community. The lower court dismissed the suit, holding that the community was governed by the Hindu Mitakshara Law and there was no customary law entitling the daughters to a share in their father's assets or streedhanam.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence did not establish any customary law entitling the daughters to a share in their father's assets or streedhanam as a matter of right. The suit was dismissed, and the decree of the lower court was confirmed.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Thenkasi Vellala community had a customary law entitling daughters to a share in their father's assets or streedhanam.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the evidence did not establish the existence of any customary law entitling daughters to a share in their father's assets or streedhanam. The court also emphasized the need for specific allegations and proof of the custom relied upon.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the decree of the lower court was confirmed, with costs awarded to the defendants. The State was allowed to realize the court fee payable by the plaintiff-appellant on this appeal.

Judgment :-

1. The suit which has given rise to this appeal was brought by a Thenkasi Vellala woman for partition and recovery of one-fifth share in her deceased father's assets which she claimed she was entitled to get under the customary law governing her community, with an alternative prayer that in case it was found that she was not entitled to get a decree for partition she might be allowed to recover Rs. 25,000/- from her father's estate in the hands of her brothers in lieu of the streedhanam she was entitled to get from the father's estate under the customary law of the community, or allowed to recover immovable properties worth thus much of money from the properties left by her father. Defendants 1 and 2 are the brothers of the plaintiff, and defendants 3 & 4 her elder sisters. Defendant 5 is their mother. The suit was dismissed by the lower court which held that the Thenkasi Vellala community was governed by the Hindu Mitakshara Law and there was no customary law in the community as alleged by the plaintiff entitling the daughters to get a share in their father's properties or to get streedhanam from the father's assets as a matter of right. Plaintiff has, therefore, filed this appeal.

2. According to the tradition which is accepted by both sides, the Thenkasi Vellalas are a community which originally belonged to Thenkasi in the Tinnevelli District and emigrated from there to Travancore some centuries back and settled down principally in the Thodupuzha Taluk. Some of the witnesses examined in the case say there are only 300 families even in the Thodupuzha Taluk while others have given a higher estimate. The estimates given by other witnesses range from 500 to 800 families in the Thodupuzha Taluk. There are, admittedly, only a handful of families living in other parts of the State. It is also admitted by both sides that the Thenkasi Vellalas are followers of the Hindu religion, and in the description of the parties in the plaint the religion of the plaintiff & defendants 1 to 5 is given as Hindu religion. Perumal Pillai Sankara Pillai, the father of the plaintiff & defendants 1 to 4 & the husband of defendant 5, was a vakil practising in the courts in the Thodupuzha Taluk. He died in Kumbhom 1118 M.E. leaving considerable properties. About 7 years later, on 22-9-4950, the plaintiff brought the present suit in forma pauperis claiming that under the customary law governing the Thenkasi Vellalas, daughters were entitled to share equally with sons in the assets left by their father and that she was therefore entitled to get one-fifth of the assets left by Perumal Pillai Sankara Pillai, and praying for partition and recovery of the said share with past and future mesne profits after partition of the same by metes and bounds. The suit, as originally brought, was only for partition and recovery of possession of the above share, and it was stated in Para.7 of the original plaint that among the Thenkasi Vellalas daughters and sons have equal shares in their fathers assets and that the rule of law under the Hindu Mithakshara law under which daughters have no right to get any share in their father's assets is not applicable to their community. In October 1951 the plaintiff filed an amended plaint, after obtaining leave to do so, claiming an alternative relief for recovering from her father's estate in the hands of defendants 1 and 2 Rs. 25,000/-on account of streedhanam which she was entitled to get from the father's estate or for recovering properties worth thus much of money. The alternative relief was asked for on the ground that among the Thenkasi Vellalas in the Thodupuzha Taluk there was a long standing custom, which was being observed uninterruptedly, of giving even to married daughters some share in their father's assets under the name of streedhanam, or avakasam, etc., but plaintiff had not been given any streedhanam at the time of her marriage, and that on account of this custom which has obtained the force of law the pl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top