SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Ker) 86

SANKARAN, KUMARA PILLAI
Saithu Muhammath Rowther – Appellant
Versus
Meemi Kadir – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The question involved in all these revision petitions is the same and it is whether the Anjikaimal District Court at Ernakulam acted illegally in returning the appeals referred to in its impugned orders on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to entertain those appeals. The appeals thus returned are A.S. Nos. 128/55,119/55,126/55,125/55 and 127/55 on the file of that Court. These appeals are against the decrees passed on 23.5.1955 by the Ernakulam District Munsiff's Court in O.S. 697/1952, 683/52, 725/52, 723/52 and 696/52 on its file. The properties involved in all these suits are in the Chowara Village which was within the jurisdiction of the Ernakulam Munsiff's Court at the time of the institution of the suits and also at the time of their disposal by the District Munsiff at Ernakulam. Subsequently on account of territorial re-adjustment Chowara Village was brought under the jurisdiction of the District Munsiff's Court at Perumabvoor. Such a re-adjustment of territorial jurisdiction was brought about by a notification published by the Government in exercise of the powers vested in them under S.11 of the Travancore-Cochin Civil Courts Act (Act XXII of 1951). The





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top