SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Ker) 30

Judges : GOVINDA PILLAI,JOSEPH
Gomez - Appellant
Versus
Gomez - Respondent
Case No : A. S. No. 120 of 1953
Decided On : 02/23/1955
Advocates Appeared :
M. N. Parameswaran Pillai; For Appellant N. Krishnaswamy Iyengar; For Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is that under S. 234 of the Indian Succession Act, a legatee having a beneficial interest is entitled to the grant of letters of administration. The judgment also emphasizes the importance of complying with the formalities of law regarding the execution and attestation of a Will, and the lack of evidence for revocation.

Headnote:

Grant of Letters of Administration - Indian Succession Act - S. 234, S. 113 - The court allowed the appeal and declared that the petitioner is entitled to the grant of letters of administration as prayed for. The court below is directed to grant to the petitioner letters of administration with the authenticated copy of the Will annexed in respect of the assets shown in the petition.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant applied for the grant of letters of administration with a copy of the Will annexed in respect of the estate of his mother's father John George Gomez who died at Anjengo on 25.2.1927. The application was opposed by the 5th respondent, contending that the District Court of Trivandrum had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant was entitled to the grant of letters of administration under S. 234 of the Indian Succession Act, as he was a legatee having a beneficial interest. The court also held that the Will was executed and attested as required by law, and there was no evidence of revocation. The court further ruled that the long delay in making the application was an irrelevant consideration and that the application was not an indirect attempt to get a declaration of title from the probate court.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant was entitled to the grant of letters of administration under S. 234 of the Indian Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of S. 234 of the Indian Succession Act, which allowed the appellant to be considered a legatee having a beneficial interest. The court also emphasized the formalities of law regarding the execution and attestation of the Will, and the lack of evidence for revocation. The court disregarded the long delay in making the application as an irrelevant consideration and rejected the argument that the application was an indirect attempt to get a declaration of title from the probate court.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and directed the court below to grant the petitioner letters of administration with the authenticated copy of the Will annexed in respect of the assets shown in the petition.

Judgment :-

1. The appellant applied for the grant of letters of administration with a copy of the Will annexed in respect of the estate of his mother's father John George Gomez who died at Anjengo on 25.2.1927. The application was originally made to the Subordinate Judge, Tinnevelly, within whose jurisdiction Anjengo was at that time but consequent on the transfer of the territory to this State, the application was transferred to the District Court of Trivandrum where it was numbered as Probate Petition No. 5 of 1950. John George Gomez left surviving him, his widow Mrs. Joanesa Gomez who died on 6.6.1936, two sons George John Gomez and Walter J. Gomez and three daughters Mary D'Silva who died on 18.10.1936, Margaret Gomez and Jessie Fernandez. The appellant is a son of Margaret Gomez. It was alleged by the petitioner that of the two executors appointed under the Will viz. Joseph Gomez and J.C. Pereira, the former was dead and the latter was unwilling to act as executor, that Joanesa Gomez and Simon T. Gomez who were to act as executors in case the two persons named above found it inconvenient to do so were both dead, that the petitioner was a legatee under the Will, that letters of administration should be granted to him in that capacity and that the assets that were likely to come to his hands were the properties described as items Nos.1 to 4 in Schedule A to the Will. The original Will was said to be missing and an authenticated copy obtained from the office of the Sub-Registrar of Anjengo where the original was registered was produced along with the petition. The petition was opposed in the court below and here by the 5th respondent to whom items Nos.1 to 4 in Schedule A had been sold by the petitioner's mother Margaret Gomez, to discharge the decree debt which was obtained on the mortgage mentioned in the Will, for the realisation of which, these properties had been sold in court sale. He contended that the District Court of Trivandrum had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The allegation that John George Gomez had left a Will of which Ext. A was produced as a copy was denied. It was also contended that the petitioner was not entitled to the grant of letters of administration, that the assets were not correctly stated in the petition, that the assets described in the schedule annexed to the petition belonged to him, that the original Will was not produced because the same was destroyed by the testator with intent to revoke the same, that the long delay in making the application was a ground for dismissing the petition and that all the formalities of law had not been complied with. The court below refused to grant letters of administration holding that the execution of the Will was not satisfactorily proved, that one of the witnesses to the Will did not sign the same, that the Will must have been revoked, that there was no estate to be administered, that the petition was defective in as much as it was for the grant of letters of administration for a part only of the assets of the testator and that the petition was an attempt to get by indirect means a declaration of the petitioner's title from the probate court for the purpose of a civil suit pending between the parties.

2. The circumstances in which the petition was filed may also be stated. After the testator's death a suit for recovery of the amount under the simple mortgage mentioned as the first item of debt in Schedule B to the Will was filed as O.S. No. 5 of 1936 of the Anjengo Munsiff's Court and a decree was obtained. Ext. A is copy of the plaint. The properties described as items Nos.1 and 2 in the petition which were items Nos. 1 to 4 in Ext. A were sold in court sale for a portion of the decree amount on 18.6.1943. Ext. F is copy of a petition dated 8.10.1942 filed by Margaret Gomez for postponing the sale. On 12.7.1943 Jessie Fernandez one of the daughters of the testator filed an application for setting aside the ex-parte decree in the case and another














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top