SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Ker) 66

Judges : KOSHI,KUMARA PILLAI
Vasu Nair - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Case No : Crl. A. No. 71 of 1952
Decided On : 03/26/1954
Advocates Appeared :
K. G. Kunjukrishna Pillai; For Appellants N. Kumaran Achan; For State

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's finding of the appellants' guilt for criminal conspiracy, forming an unlawful assembly, and committing various offences including murder, voluntarily causing hurt, and waging war against the Raj Pramukh.

Headnote:

Criminal Conspiracy - Attack on Police - Ss. 110B, 112, 140, 141, 301, 307, 324, 326, 332 T.P.C. - The court found the appellants guilty of criminal conspiracy to assault and murder the Inspector and Police constables, forming an unlawful assembly, and committing various offences including murder, voluntarily causing hurt, and waging war against the Raj Pramukh. The evidence showed that the appellants and their associates planned and executed the attack, resulting in the deaths of the Inspector and two Police constables. The court confirmed the convictions for the other offences but set aside the convictions under S. 112 TPC and the sentences passed for that offence.

Fact of the Case:

An organised body of persons, including the appellants, attacked the Inspector of Police and a party of Police constables, resulting in the deaths of the Inspector and two Police constables. The attack was planned and executed in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy to assault and murder the Police party.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellants guilty of criminal conspiracy, forming an unlawful assembly, and committing various offences including murder, voluntarily causing hurt, and waging war against the Raj Pramukh. The evidence showed that the appellants and their associates planned and executed the attack, resulting in the deaths of the Inspector and two Police constables.

Issues: The main issues were the reliability of the prosecution evidence, the applicability of Ss. 110B and 112 TPC, and the sufficiency of the sanction for filing a complaint under S. 110B TPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the evidence proved the appellants' involvement in the criminal conspiracy and the execution of the attack, leading to their convictions for various offences. The court also found that the requirements of S. 192 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were complied with, and the contention regarding the insufficiency of the sanction for filing a complaint under S. 110B TPC was dismissed.

Final Decision: The court confirmed the convictions for the other offences but set aside the convictions under S. 112 TPC and the sentences passed for that offence. The appeal was dismissed except for the convictions under S. 112 TPC and the sentences passed for that offence, which were set aside.

Judgment :-

1. This appeal arises out of Sessions Case No. 19 of 1951 on the file of the Quilon Sessions Court. On 31.12.1949 (corresponding to 16.5.1125 M.E.) at about 11 p.m. an organised body of persons attacked the Inspector of Police, Adoor and a party of Police constables who were camping with him at Sooranad in Kunnathoor Taluk, while they were on patrol duty, and murdered the Inspector and three Police constables and also caused hurt to some of the other police constables in the party. For this incident a charge-sheet, Ext. BS, was laid on 30.6.1950 by the Inspector of Police, Adoor, before the Kunnathoor Taluk Second Class Magistrate, against 26 persons for offences punishable under Ss. 140, 141, 396, 301, 324, 332, 428,110B and 112 T.P.C., corresponding to sections 148, 149, 396, 302, 324, 332, 427,120B and 121 IPC. The charge under S. 141 TPC related to the liability of every member of the unlawful assembly for the offences committed in prosecution of the common object. The other offences for which the accused were charged were rioting armed with deadly weapons, dacoity with murder, murder, voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons, voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty, committing mischief, criminal conspiracy, and waging war against the Raj Pramukh. When the charge-sheet was filed in Court, accused No. 18 therein was already dead, and the Police were not able to apprehend and produce accused Nos. 3, 4,11,13,19, 20, 23, 24 and 26 in the charge-sheet as they had absconded. So, the preliminary enquiry was proceeded with only in respect of accused 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22 and 25 in the charge-sheet. Even out of these accused, accused 6 and 14 died during the course of the preliminary inquiry. After it was charged, the case was transferred from the Taluk Second Class Magistrate's Court, Adoor, to the Court of the Special First Class Magistrate, Quilon, and the preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Special Magistrate. After the conclusion of the preliminary enquiry, the learned Magistrate committed all the accused in respect of whom the preliminary enquiry was conducted to take their trial in Sessions Court of Quilon, but the 1st accused in the charge-sheet also died after the commitment. The remaining 13 persons, i.e., accused 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 21, 22 and 25 were arraigned as accused 1 to 13 in the Sessions Court. These accused will hereafter be referred to in this judgment with reference to their position on the array of the accused in the Sessions Court as accused 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. The other accused mentioned in the charge-sheet, but not committed to the Sessions Court, have been referred to by the Sessions Judge as Ch. 1, Ch. 3, Ch. 4, Ch. 11, Ch. 13 etc. these being their numbers on the array of the accused as given in the charge-sheet, Ext. BS, and they will be referred to accordingly in this judgment also. Even out of the 13 accused committed to the Sessions Court, the 8th accused was not able to take his trial as he was suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis and had to be taken to the T.B. Hospital, Nagercoil, for treatment. Of the remaining 12 accused tried by the Sessions Judge, two, viz., accused 11 and 12 were acquitted and ten, viz., accused 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9,10 and 13 were convicted under various sections. The 10th accused was convicted only under S. 135 TPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. He has undergone his sentence; and no appeal has been filed against his conviction and sentence. All the remaining accused, viz., accused 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 13 were convicted under S. 112 TPC for waging war against the Raj Pramukh and every one of them was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and also to forfeit his property for this conviction. The 13th accused was further convicted under S. 139 and S. 141 TPC read with Ss. 301, 307, 324, 326 and 332 TPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top