SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Ker) 40

KOSHI, M.S.MENON
Othamchand Sait – Appellant
Versus
Padmanabha Shenoi – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 16 of 1121 of the District Court of Anjikaimal. He is the owner of an item of property in Mattancherry and the defendant is his lessee. The lower court has held that there has been no proper notice of termination and negatived the plaintiff's prayer for recovery of possession.

2. We propose to assume, without deciding, that the plaintiff is right when he says that the tenancy concerned is a tenancy from month to month commencing on the first of each month reckoned according to the English Calender. On that basis the notice required under S. 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 is:

"Fifteen days' notice expiring with the end of a month of the tenancy".

and the only question for decision will be whether Ext. AG dated 15.8.1945 amounts to a proper notice of termination or not.

3. The relevant portion of Ext. AG reads as follows:

".......this is to give you notice that I terminate your tenancy with effect from the last day of August 1945. I hereby demand of you the surrender of the buildings and premises on the said date for which purpose I shall be present at the premises between 4 and 5 P.M. on 31.8.1945."

It is common gro


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top