SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Ker) 30

JOSEPH, KOSHI, SUBRAMONIA.IYER
Lekshmi – Appellant
Versus
Siva Pillai – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The decree-holder in O.S. 1185/03 on the file of the District Munsiff's Court of Nagercoil has preferred this Second Appeal. The sole question for decision relates to the interpretation of the words "the date of the decree" in S.11 of the Travancore Debt Relief Act (II of 1116). The facts relevant for the purpose of this second appeal may be briefly stated as follows:

2. The District Munsiff's Court of Nagercoil passed a decree on 27.4.110/12.12.34 allowing the decree holder to recover from the defendant 107 Kottahs, 3 marakkals and 6 padies of paddy or its value in money. On appeal to the District Court the decree of the trial court was modified, allowing recovery of a higher amount viz., 4911 fanams. The decree of the District Court was passed on 19.11.1111/2.7.36. The defendant's second appeal against the decree was dismissed by the High Court of Travancore on 9.7.1115/21.2.40. The judgment debtor applied under S. 8, 9 and 15 of Act 11 of 1116 for fixing the amount of the debt and allowing payment of the same in instalments. The amount had to be fixed according to the provisions of S.11 of the Act which is extracted below:

"In determining the amount of a decree deb






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top