SUBRAMONIA.IYER, VITHAYATHIL
Chidambara Iyer – Appellant
Versus
Janardhana Iyer – Respondent
1. The defendant in O.S. 881 of 1119 on the file of Munsiffs Court of Kottarakara appeals against the decree passed in favour of the plaintiffs on foot of a promissory note executed by him to the plaintiffs deceased father on 23-10-1113 (Ex. A) for Rs. 1,500. The plaintiffs are the only sons of the deceased payee of whom the 1st plaintiff died since. The 2nd plaintiff is the son-in-law of the defendant, having married his daughter in the year 1095. In connection with the marriage, to be clearer, by way of Varasulka, a promissory, note for Rs. 500/- was executed by the defendant to the plaintiffs' father on 13-10-1095 (Ex. I) after the marriage. This promissory note was renewed on 3-10-1101 (Ex. V) for Rs. 650 which represents the principal and interest. Ex.V was further renewed on 26-10-1107 (Ex. B) for Rs. 1,000 including the interest that accrued due till then. The promissory note sued on is the renewal of Ex. B. Exs. I, V and B contain endorsements of the aforesaid renewals. The plaintiffs' case was that the transaction evidenced by Ex. A is one for cash consideration as it purports to be. That story was disbelieved by the court below which found that Ex. A is really
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.