1. Plaintiffs 1, 3 and 4 are the appellants. The plaint schedule properties belong to the family of one Hari Vadyar. He died in Mithunam 1119 leaving a son, Rang Vadyar and two daughters, who are the first plaintiff and the first defendant. This Ranga Vadyar was alleged to have died on 15.6.1121 without leaving any wife or children. The first plaintiff and the first defendant had, therefore, inherited the rights of Ranga Vadyar over the plaint properties. The plaintiffs stated that, before the death of Hari Vadyar, he had executed some documents relating to the plaint properties. These documents were invalid, as he was not competent to dispose of the original family properties by such documents. Under these documents, the first defendant's husband, the 7th defendant, was constituted manager of the family. He had been directed to hand over the properties and money, if any collected, to Ranga Vadyar if he returned within one year after the death of Hari Vadyar. The 7th defendant was also the Mukthiyar-holder of the first defendant. He had filed suits O.S. 240,138 and 225 of 1120 and O.S. 355 of 1119 for arrears of rent as regards certain portions of the buildings in the p