KUNHI RAMAN, SUBRAMONIA.IYER
Kochu Vareed – Appellant
Versus
Mariam – Respondent
The plaintiff - Decree-holder and his surety are the appellants. The proceedings in the court below were for restitution for which an execution petition was filed in respect of a sum of money drawn out by
the decree holder under an ex parte decree. The ex parte decree was passed on 9.10.1117 in O.S. 311 of 1117. In execution of that decree a certain amount standing to the credit of the judgment-debtor was proceeded against and a sum of Rs. 200 odd was brought into court and credited towards the decree. Thereupon, the decree-holder who had secured the exparte decree applied for payment out. This was granted subject to security being furnished. The surety who is one of the appellants in the present case was the person who furnished such security by executing a bond. Subsequently, the ex parte decree was set aside on application made by the judgment-debtor. This was done on 15.10.1118. The suit was heard in due course on the merits and ultimately a decree for Rs. 7 odd was passed on 28.11.1119. From this decision A.S. No. 50/1120 was preferred and the appellate court on 26.2.1121 confirmed the decision of the trial court. On 10.12.1122 E.P. 1334/1122 was filed on behalf of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.