SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Ker) 35

SANKARAN, KUNHI RAMAN
Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Anchalo Fernandez – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Calendar Case No. 2281 of 1123 was tried by the Stationery Second Class Magistrate, Trivandrum City. The case was started at the instance of the complainant whose child, aged 21/2 years, was said to have been knocked down by the accused, who was riding on a motor cycle. The charge against the accused was under S.277 and 337 of the Travancore Penal Code. On 25.7.1124, to which date the case was posted after it had become partheard, the complainant's name was called and he was not present. For that reason, the Magistrate acquitted the accused under S.244 of the Travancore Criminal Procedure Code. This revision case is from the order of the Magistrate.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the complainant petitioner states that the complainant is a public servant, that his evidence was already recorded on a previous date when the case came on for hearing and that his personal attendance was not necessary on the date on which the order of acquittal was passed by the Magistrate. It appears from the order of the court below that the complainant was represented by Advocate. It is stated that the Advocate was present when the case was called. According to the proviso to S.244,



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top