SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 132

J.B.KOSHY, K.HEMA
Subash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:P. Narayanan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.

Judgment :-

Koshy, J.

Due to the apparent conflicting views taken by the learned Single Judges in the decisions reported in Vikraman v. State of Kerala (ILR 2006(4) Kerala 932) and Sabu v. State of Kerala [2007 (3) KLJ 157] this case is referred to the Division Bench. The question to be answered is whether Magistrate can take cognizance of an offence under the Abkari Act on the basis of a report filed by Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, who is not an Abkari Officer as defined under the Abkari Act.

2. This appeal is filed against the judgment in S.C.No.219 of 2000 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Fast Track (Ad hoc- II), Kozhikode. Appellant faced trial for offence under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act. The report (concerned) was filed by Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Edacheri Police Station. The allegation was that the appellant was found in possession of 19 bottles, each containing 180 ml. (total 35 litres) of Indian made foreign liquor without having permit or the sticker of Kerala State Beverages Corporation as against the provisions of the Abkari Act and Foreign Liquor Rules and therefore he committed offence under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act. According



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top