SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ker) 92

R.BASANT
Sajeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
P. Dhanya – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:B.H. Mansoor, Advocate. For the Respondents:K.S. Madhusoodanan, Advocate.

Judgment :

This revision petition challenges a direction under Section 125 Cr.P.C issued by the Family Court to the petitioner to pay maintenance @ Rs.1,500/- and Rs.750/-per mensem respectively to his divorced wife and child.

2. The fundamental facts are not disputed. The marriage is admitted. The divorce under Ext.B1 order of the Family Court is also admitted. That divorce was granted on the ground of desertion by the wife is also not disputed. After the divorce, the divorced wife claimed maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C as she continues to be a deemed wife under explanation (b) to Section 125 Cr.P.C.

3. The petitioner attempted to resist the claim for maintenance on various grounds. It was contended that a woman who has suffered an order of divorce on account of contumacious matrimonial conduct on her part which led to the passing of the order of divorce is not entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125. It was also contended that in any view of the matter, under Section 125 (4) Cr.P.C, the claimant/divorced wife is not entitled to claim maintenance. Of course contentions were raised that the claimant wife is not unable to maintain herself and that the petitioner/husban












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top