Mohanan, J.

Hopefully pointing out the grievance of the petitioner regarding the alleged illegal detention of her husband namely Sri. Bruce.S. Pothanikkatt, Keerambara, the petitioner approached this court by filing the above writ petition invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The main prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition is to issue a writ of hebeas corpus commanding the respondents to produce the body of the aforesaid person-the husband of the petitioner before this Court and to set him at liberty forthwith. It is also prayed to declare that the detention of her husband under the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007 (Act 34 of 2007) (hereinafter referred to for short as ‘the Act’ only) is violative of Articles 14,19, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India as the procedural safeguards have been violated.

2. Theallegations in the writ petition as its original form are as follows:-

According to the petitioner, she read from the newspaper on the morning of 3.2008 that her husband, the above named, has been implicated under the Act without any justification. According to her, the husb