R.BASANT
Muthulakshmi Amma – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Prabhakaran – Respondent
Petitioner in this case is the mother of the complainant in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The said complainant is not available in India and is working abroad. A power of attorney holder of the complainant has been examined as a witness(PW1) on the side of the complainant. Such power of attorney holder in the course of evidence tendered by him, had stated that the accused has his house near the house of the mother of the complainant, i.e. the petitioner herein. The accused has a case that he has nothing to do with the complainant and that the complainant is a total stranger to him. It is in that context that the power of attorney(witness) was cross examined and the witness gave the answer that the complainants mother has her house at Karthikappally and the house of the accused is near the said house of the petitioner herein.
2. On the basis of the said statement of PW1, the accused filed an application that the petitioner, i.e., the mother of the complainant, be examined as a defence witness. That prayer was allowed by the learned Magistrate and summons was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner in these circumstances went to the Ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.