P.R.RAMAN, T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
T. Thanuja Sunderdas – Appellant
Versus
Suryamkandi Sisirkumar Raj – Respondent
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The petitioners herein are the tenants in a petition for eviction filed under Sections 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965 (herein after referred to as the Act). The Rent Control Court allowed eviction of the premises - a non-residential building – under Section 11
(3) of the Act and disallowed the claim for eviction under Section 11(4)(i) of the Act. The appeal filed by the revision petitioners herein before the Appellate Authority having been dismissed, they have approached this court by filing this revision petition under Section 20 of the Act.
2. The respondents herein who are the landlords, sought eviction under Section 11(3) of the Act on the ground that their father Rajarathnam wants to start a stationery business and for the said purpose they are in need of the petition schedule building. It was contended that for starting the said business, the petitioners or their father have no other buildings in their possession. The tenants mainly contended that there are no other buildings available in the locality for their occupation if they are evicted and there are no other income also for them. They denied t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.